On the cotangent space on a smooth manifold, defined from its structure sheaf


This article is part of my migration effort, moving some of my articles over from the excellent Functor Network.


Any smooth manifold MM comes with its sheaf of rings of smooth functions. This sheaf labels each open set UU in MM with the set π’žβˆž(U)\mathcal{C}^\infty(U) of smooth, real-valued function defined over UU. Given any point p∈Mp \in M, the stalk at pp, written π’žp∞\mathcal{C}^\infty_p, is defined to be the direct limit over the directed set of all open neighborhoods of pp (this directed set is written as 𝒩p\mathcal{N}_p): π’žp∞=limβ†’Uβˆˆπ’©pπ’žβˆž(U).\mathcal{C}^\infty_p = \underset{\rightarrow}{\operatorname{lim}}_{U \in \mathcal{N}_p} \mathcal{C}^\infty(U).

Elements of π’žp∞\mathcal{C}^\infty_p are called germs at pp and they are essentially β€œshreds” of a smooth function at a point. They can be interpreted somewhat abstractly as the set of functions that are defined β€œclose” to pp, on an infinitesimal (or, if you prefer, arbitrary small) open neighborhood around pp. Concretely, germs are equivalence classes, each one represented by a smooth function ff defined on some open set containing pp. For any germ [f][f] at pp, we may evaluate any representative function ff at pp, and this gives a well-defined morphism of rings, called the evaluation at pp: ev⁑p:π’žpβˆžβ†’β„.\operatorname{ev}_p : \mathcal{C}^\infty_p \to \mathbb{R}. The kernel of ev⁑p\operatorname{ev}_p is precisely the ideal of smooth functions which vanish at pp, which we denote IpI_p. Because π’žp∞/Ip≅ℝ\mathcal{C}^\infty_p/I_p \cong \mathbb{R}, the ideal IpI_p is actually a maximal ideal. Since any germ not in IpI_p is represented by a smooth function which is nonzero and thus invertible around pp, the ideal IpI_p is the only maximal ideal of the ring π’žp∞\mathcal{C}^\infty_p. We say in that case π’žp∞\mathcal{C}^\infty_p is a local ring, and MM is a locally ringed space because π’žp∞\mathcal{C}^\infty_p is a local ring at every point of the smooth manifold MM.

Recall how products of ideals work: the ideal Ip2I_p^2 is the ideal generated by products of the form [f][g][f][g], with both [f][f] and [g][g] germs at pp that vanish there. Because Ip2βŠ†IpI_p^2 \subseteq I_p, we can take the quotient Ip/Ip2I_p/I_p^2. This ideal in π’žp∞\mathcal{C}^\infty_p is actually a real vector space, in a natural way (hint: π’žp∞/Ip≅ℝ\mathcal{C}^\infty_p/I_p \cong \mathbb{R}). It can be used as the definition of the cotangent space at pp on the manifold, written as Tp*MT^*_pM. If MM is of dimension nn then, by the multivariate version of Taylor’s theorem, any smooth function can be written, in local coordinates x=(x1,x2,…,xn)x = (x^1,x^2,\dots,x^n) around pp, as f(x)=D(x)+βˆ‘|Ξ±|=2(cΞ±+hΞ±(x))xΞ±f(x) = D(x) + \sum_{|\alpha|=2}(c_\alpha + h_\alpha(x))x^\alpha where DD is a linear map ℝn→ℝ\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}, each Ξ±\alpha is a multi-index as usual, each cΞ±c_\alpha is some real number, and each hΞ±h_\alpha is a function such that lim⁑xβ†’0hΞ±(x)=0\lim_{x \to 0} h_\alpha(x) = 0. From this, we see that the germ [f][f] is represented by [D][D] in Tp*MT_p^*M, since the part where we sum over indices Ξ±\alpha with |Ξ±|=2|\alpha| = 2 is killed when we quotient out Ip2I_p^2. Now we see that Tp*MT_p^*M is actually a finite real vector space of dimension nn, with basis the set of (classes of) germs represented by the linear maps which are defined around pp and which send, in the local coordinates, a point to its ii-th coordinate. We write these linear maps as dxidx_i. Now the tangent space at a point pp on a smooth manifold MM, written as TpMT_pM, can be defined as the dual of the vector space Tp*MT_p^*M.

The construction of the tangent space from the cotangent space is interesting. It shows how the cotangent space is somehow more algebraically natural, while the tangent space is obviously more natural from a geometrical point of view. This illustrate a general phenomenon, where geometry and algebra are two sides of the same coin. But this is also interesting because we only used the locally ringed space structure on the manifold MM (the fact we have smooth functions was only used to show it corresponds to the usual definition). Hence we can go through the cotangent space construction in order to build tangent spaces at points on any locally ringed space, such as schemes.